How to move forward with DSLR video

I recently read a blog post by Jonathan Schuler where he commented on the buzz in the VJ/PJ community about Vincent Laforet’s recent comment comparing producing video with a DSLR versus using a high end ENG camcorder. The DSLR came out on the short end of the stick for all the known reasons – no XLR mic input, dual sound requirements, general workflow, etc.

BTW (by the way) to VJ/PJ (video journalist – photo journalist) you can add MJ for multimedia journalist to the list. Now you’ve got all the ingredients for the alphabet soup that signifies the chaos in this market segment right now.

Anyway, Jonathan took the sane position that Laforet had simply given the VJ/PJ/MJ community permission to use standard video camcorders if that suited their purpose best.

Ah… one of my favorite strategies – use the right tool for the job.

As it has been said – if all you have is a hammer everything looks like a nail.

I love taking cutting edge tech and using it on traditional marketing and communication programs.

But one of the key rules of that game is being able to see what is right for the situation and having the sanity to do just that.

Have you heard of Occam’s razor?

It goes like this…

entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem

In English that says “entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity.”

In plain English that means the simplest solution is usually the correct one.

For Jonathan, the simplest solution is a DSLR shooting stills and video. He’s in remote parts of the world, shooting by himself with no crew, without an AC outlet for miles, sometimes having to carry his entire kit in a pack on his back as he walks in where no Land Rover can get.

Add in his photographic experience and eye for stunning images and it’s no wonder he gladly traded traditional video camcorders for a DSLR and a couple of good lenses.

Laforet, on the other hand, is likely to find the simplest solution to be a bit different. He’s used to working with a full crew and all the high-end equipment a Canon-sponsored superstar could ask for. I mean, he’s the one in the video above – not Jonathan.

Just to be fair, here’s one of Jonathan’s videos. He’s a man on a mission and brings all his passion to his profession.

What’s the take away for you here?

In golf there is a strategy of “playing your game”. So every guy in your group pulls out a driver with a head the size of a grapefruit and swings with everything he’s got. And they all end up in the crap – sand, water, woods, deep grass.

You pull out your favorite 5 iron and pop one 200 yards down the middle. Guess who will win more often?

Here’s a more relevant situation.

You’re checking the lighting and notice that you need more fill. You could grab a light, a stand, an AC cable, a couple of clips and some diffusion material. Or you could slide a reflector over and lean it up against the wall. Which is simpler?

The danger in this strategy is getting stuck and watching the evolving world pass you by.

I believe the key is finding a way to try new technology that is sane. Here are some ways to do that.

  • Adopt the mindset of a beginner – be easy with yourself and laugh at your mistakes.
  • Learn everything you can from every source available – even people who are negative about new tech have a perspective worth considering.
  • Choose wisely when to step into direct experience – spend the time and money to practice, do dry runs, rehearsals, and test shoots.
  • Always have a plan B – if the timing/budget are critical or your reputation is on the line take it to another level and have a plan C.

How are you making the choice of which technology to use? Let me know…

-a-

{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }

B vd Watt May 10, 2010 at 12:46 pm

The DSLR HD industry is all very well, but the big broadcasters like National Geographic, BBc and Discovery don’t accept the DSLR as an acquisition format.

Reply

Adriel Brunson May 10, 2010 at 2:50 pm

Excellent point – it’s always important to know the distribution for a project. All broadcasters have specifications that must be met or your footage/project will be rejected. The same is true even for youtube.com and other online video services. And all those specs are not the same.

It used to be common to upload at least two, sometimes three, versions of a video file for online streaming just to match browser requirements. I just saw a similar requirement for using HTML5 – not all browsers support H.264 so it’s wise to include .ogg and .flv versions to allow the users browser to find a file format that will play.

I wonder, though, if you transcoded the footage into the formats accepted by NatGeo, BBC, Discovery, etc. if they would accept it.

Any ideas?

Reply

B vd Watt May 10, 2010 at 8:46 am

The DSLR HD industry is all very well, but the big broadcasters like National Geographic, BBc and Discovery don’t accept the DSLR as an acquisition format.

Reply

adriel May 10, 2010 at 10:50 am

Excellent point – it’s always important to know the distribution for a project. All broadcasters have specifications that must be met or your footage/project will be rejected. The same is true even for youtube.com and other online video services. And all those specs are not the same.

It used to be common to upload at least two, sometimes three, versions of a video file for online streaming just to match browser requirements. I just saw a similar requirement for using HTML5 – not all browsers support H.264 so it’s wise to include .ogg and .flv versions to allow the users browser to find a file format that will play.

I wonder, though, if you transcoded the footage into the formats accepted by NatGeo, BBC, Discovery, etc. if they would accept it.

Any ideas?

Reply

B vd Watt May 10, 2010 at 3:31 pm

Well I know that the big broadcasters prefer 35Mbps and up and the Canon DSLR’s run at about 47Mbps. The issue comes with the rolling shutter effect and the aliasing issues. This is a big deal for them.
so encoding to another format will not solve those problems.

Reply

Adriel Brunson May 10, 2010 at 6:06 pm

Right you are – there’s no way to remove those problems once they’re on the clip. Rolling shutter can be minimized by shooting from a tripod but aliasing is much more difficult to avoid. Somehow Dan Chung at http://www.dslrnewsshooter.com is able to create finished programs that do run on major news networks using a Canon 5D.

Reply

B vd Watt May 10, 2010 at 11:31 am

Well I know that the big broadcasters prefer 35Mbps and up and the Canon DSLR’s run at about 47Mbps. The issue comes with the rolling shutter effect and the aliasing issues. This is a big deal for them.
so encoding to another format will not solve those problems.

Reply

adriel May 10, 2010 at 2:06 pm

Right you are – there’s no way to remove those problems once they’re on the clip. Rolling shutter can be minimized by shooting from a tripod but aliasing is much more difficult to avoid. Somehow Dan Chung at http://www.dslrnewsshooter.com is able to create finished programs that do run on major news networks using a Canon 5D.

Reply

James Drake May 10, 2010 at 4:38 pm

I agree with some of what Vincent Laforet has to say. I shot a documentary in Haiti before the earthquake in November. We used the 5Dmk2 and an EX1 to cover. Some of the 5D stuff is gorgeous, as usual, though the EX1 certainly did the job. The only advantage we saw of the 5D (NOT IN POST) was the ability to separate subjects from the background with selective focus. Otherwise, the EX1 would have been well suited to shoot the entire piece.

We have a trailer posted if you’re interested:
http://www.jdfnet.com/vblog/?p=148

Reply

Adriel Brunson May 10, 2010 at 6:22 pm

James,
Nice work – the embedded video on your site didn’t want to load. I found the trailer on Vimeo – http://vimeo.com/8148444

I agree with your experience. You can use a DSLR or a quality HD camcorder and get great results. It’s not the tool as much as it is the artist. Actually, it’s easier to shoot great footage with a camcorder. DSLR’s take more messin’ with so you need to make sure it’s worth it. (Messin’ with is a technical term… shoot with a crew from Texas if you don’t believe me!)

Reply

Adriel Brunson May 10, 2010 at 9:03 pm

From another point of view…
Here’s a link to an article about an episode of the television series “House” shot entirely on Canon 5D’s using standard Canon lenses. It’s a top rated show broadcast in full HD. Is there something they know that we don’t?

Reply

James Drake May 10, 2010 at 12:38 pm

I agree with some of what Vincent Laforet has to say. I shot a documentary in Haiti before the earthquake in November. We used the 5Dmk2 and an EX1 to cover. Some of the 5D stuff is gorgeous, as usual, though the EX1 certainly did the job. The only advantage we saw of the 5D (NOT IN POST) was the ability to separate subjects from the background with selective focus. Otherwise, the EX1 would have been well suited to shoot the entire piece.

We have a trailer posted if you’re interested:
http://www.jdfnet.com/vblog/?p=148

Reply

adriel May 10, 2010 at 2:22 pm

James,
Nice work – the embedded video on your site didn’t want to load. I found the trailer on Vimeo – http://vimeo.com/8148444

I agree with your experience. You can use a DSLR or a quality HD camcorder and get great results. It’s not the tool as much as it is the artist. Actually, it’s easier to shoot great footage with a camcorder. DSLR’s take more messin’ with so you need to make sure it’s worth it. (Messin’ with is a technical term… shoot with a crew from Texas if you don’t believe me!)

Reply

adriel May 10, 2010 at 5:03 pm

From another point of view…
Here’s a link to an article about an episode of the television series “House” shot entirely on Canon 5D’s using standard Canon lenses. It’s a top rated show broadcast in full HD. Is there something they know that we don’t?

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: